You’ve heard of fantasy football, right? Why not a game of fantasy government? Any takers?

Barack Obama - President
Ron Paul - Vice President
John Edwards - Attorney General
Hilliary Clinton - Secretary of State
Rudy Giuliani - Secretary of Homeland Security
John McCain - Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Bill Richardson - Secretary of Interior

Issues:

Immigration

Why it is an issue:

• Taxes resources
• Growth of population that does not honor or respect fundamental values of citizenship
• Undocumented persons

What not to do:

• Erect wall with armed robotic sentries posted at intervals along border.
• Place minefield along border.
• Continue current border patrol program.

Proposition: Implement humane programs to deter illegal immigration including but not limited to:

• Create DNA database of all captured illegals.
• Retrain border patrol agents as detectives.
• Fine and/or confiscate businesses and property of employers hiring illegals and families taking them in without reporting them.
• Zero-tolerance enforcement.
• Property is sold to finance salaries and deportation expenses.
• Possible incarceration at work camps.
• Education initiatives on both sides of the border regarding immigration.

Economy

Why it is an issue:

• Gas prices
• Home foreclosures
• Lagging wages
• Stock market jitters
• Rising education costs

What not to do:

• Continue our dependency on foreign oil.
• Continue our relationship with the Internal Revenue Service.
• Continue operating within the current economic model.
• Continue to import goods and services to meet our national needs.

Proposition:

• Divert defense budget to research and development of alternate sources of energy.
• Overhaul the American Banking System to reclaim independence from world banking industry.
• Cancel our contract with the Internal Revenue Service.
• Invest in the development of environmentally responsible and efficient energy sources.
• Divest ourselves of dependence on foreign markets.
• Strengthen our commitment to academic and vocational leadership.

Health Care

Why it is an issue:

• Because everybody in America is sick (smile).

What not to do:

• What we’ve been doing.

Proposition:

• Follow the French.

Terrorism

Why it is an issue:

• Because people still don’t believe that the Bush Administration was behind 9/11.
• Because people don’t understand how the C.I.A. operates.

What not to do:

• Believe everything the media reports without holding it up to a candle.
• Believe we are above the law.
• Force feed our views down the rest of the world’s throats.

Proposition:

• Weed corruption out of our government and keep it out.
• Adopt extreme zero tolerance policies for corruption.
• Re-establish diplomatic relationships world-wide.
• Humble ourselves as a nation and right our wrongs.
• Understand our standing in the world and recommit ourselves to excellent values.

Investigative reporter David Cay Johnston explores in his new book how in recent years, government subsidies and new regulations have quietly funneled money from the poor and the middle class to the rich and politically connected.

Cay Johnston covers tax policy for The New York Times, where he won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on that beat. His previous book, Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich — and Cheat Everybody Else, was a best seller.

The new book, which expands the inquiry beyond tax policy into a whole range of regulatory machinery, is titled Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You With the Bill).

Click here for the story in audio.

by Ari Shapiro

Updating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is one of Congress’s top priorities in 2008. FISA, as the law is known, generally tells the president that he must have a court order to spy on Americans in the United States. The law has not restricted the president’s ability to wiretap Americans traveling abroad. Some Congressional Democrats want to change that.

Click here for the audio story.

By ORLANDO PATTERSON
Published: September 30, 2007

Cambridge, Mass.

THE miscarriage of justice at Jena, La. — where five black high school students arrested for beating a white student were charged with attempted murder — and the resulting protest march tempts us to the view, expressed by several of the marchers, that not much has changed in traditional American racial relations. However, a remarkable series of high-profile incidents occurring elsewhere in the nation at about the same time, as well as the underlying reason for the demonstrations themselves, make it clear that the Jena case is hardly a throwback to the 1960s, but instead speaks to issues that are very much of our times.

What exactly attracted thousands of demonstrators to the small Louisiana town? While for some it was a simple case of righting a grievous local injustice, and for others an opportunity to relive the civil rights era, for most the real motive was a long overdue cry of outrage at the use of the prison system as a means of controlling young black men.

America has more than two million citizens behind bars, the highest absolute and per capita rate of incarceration in the world. Black Americans, a mere 13 percent of the population, constitute half of this country’s prisoners. A tenth of all black men between ages 20 and 35 are in jail or prison; blacks are incarcerated at over eight times the white rate.

The effect on black communities is catastrophic: one in three male African-Americans in their 30s now has a prison record, as do nearly two-thirds of all black male high school dropouts. These numbers and rates are incomparably greater than anything achieved at the height of the Jim Crow era. What’s odd is how long it has taken the African-American community to address in a forceful and thoughtful way this racially biased and utterly counterproductive situation.

How, after decades of undeniable racial progress, did we end up with this virtual gulag of racial incarceration?

Part of the answer is a law enforcement system that unfairly focuses on drug offenses and other crimes more likely to be committed by blacks, combined with draconian mandatory sentencing and an absurdly counterproductive retreat from rehabilitation as an integral method of dealing with offenders. An unrealistic fear of crime that is fed in part by politicians and the press, a tendency to emphasize punitive measures and old-fashioned racism are all at play here.

But there is another equally important cause: the simple fact that young black men commit a disproportionate number of crimes, especially violent crimes, which cannot be attributed to judicial bias, racism or economic hardships. The rate at which blacks commit homicides is seven times that of whites.

Why is this? Several incidents serendipitously occurring at around the same time as the march on Jena hint loudly at a possible answer.

•

In New York City, the tabloids published sensational details of the bias suit brought by a black former executive for the Knicks, Anucha Browne Sanders, who claims that she was frequently called a “bitch” and a “ho” by the Knicks coach and president, Isiah Thomas. In a video deposition, Thomas said that while it is always wrong for a white man to verbally abuse a black woman in such terms, it was “not as much … I’m sorry to say” for a black man to do so.

•

Across the nation, religious African-Americans were shocked that the evangelical minister Juanita Bynum, an enormously popular source of inspiration for churchgoing black women, said she was brutally beaten in a parking lot by her estranged husband, Bishop Thomas Weeks.

•

O. J. Simpson, the malevolent central player in an iconic moment in the nation’s recent black-white (as well as male-female) relations, reappeared on the scene, charged with attempted burglary, kidnapping and felonious assault in Las Vegas, in what he claimed was merely an attempt to recover stolen memorabilia.

These events all point to something that has been swept under the rug for too long in black America: the crisis in relations between men and women of all classes and, as a result, the catastrophic state of black family life, especially among the poor. Isiah Thomas’s outrageous double standard shocked many blacks in New York only because he had the nerve to say out loud what is a fact of life for too many black women who must daily confront indignity and abuse in hip-hop misogyny and everyday conversation.

What is done with words is merely the verbal end of a continuum of abuse that too often ends with beatings and spousal homicide. Black relationships and families fail at high rates because women increasingly refuse to put up with this abuse. The resulting absence of fathers — some 70 percent of black babies are born to single mothers — is undoubtedly a major cause of youth delinquency.

The circumstances that far too many African-Americans face — the lack of paternal support and discipline; the requirement that single mothers work regardless of the effect on their children’s care; the hypocritical refusal of conservative politicians to put their money where their mouths are on family values; the recourse by male youths to gangs as parental substitutes; the ghetto-fabulous culture of the streets; the lack of skills among black men for the jobs and pay they want; the hypersegregation of blacks into impoverished inner-city neighborhoods — all interact perversely with the prison system that simply makes hardened criminals of nonviolent drug offenders and spits out angry men who are unemployable, unreformable and unmarriageable, closing the vicious circle.

Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other leaders of the Jena demonstration who view events there, and the racial horror of our prisons, as solely the result of white racism are living not just in the past but in a state of denial. Even after removing racial bias in our judicial and prison system — as we should and must do — disproportionate numbers of young black men will continue to be incarcerated.

Until we view this social calamity in its entirety — by also acknowledging the central role of unstable relations among the sexes and within poor families, by placing a far higher priority on moral and social reform within troubled black communities, and by greatly expanding social services for infants and children — it will persist.

Orlando Patterson is a professor of sociology at Harvard and the author of “The Ordeal of Integration: Progress and Resentment in America’s ‘Racial’ Crisis.”

by Army National Guard Spc. Eleonai “Eli” Israel

Two months ago, I took a stand that changed my life forever. As a Soldier, a JVB Protective Service Agent, and a Sniper with the Army who had been in Iraq for a year (running over 250 combat missions), I refused to continue to be a part of the occupation. I regret nothing. This is my story. Currently, as I write this I am sitting in Kuwait, on “stand-by” to return to the States sometime hopefully this week. After getting out of the brig last week, I’m now scheduled to be discharged from the Army within the month. I’m looking forward to joining forces with anti-Iraq-War movements, such as Courage to Resist and Iraq Veterans Against the War.

What led me to this place in my life?
Joining up, the first time

I joined the U.S. Marine Corps in the spring of 1999, the month of my 18th birthday.

I grew up in the custody of the state of Kentucky with little contact with my biological parents since I was 13. I had no family support system and ended up on the streets, doing what street kids do.

By 16, I had eased into hard drugs. I had not been to school since the first part of 9th grade, and I was short on about everything but street smarts, an untapped sense of ambition, and a tough guy attitude.

When I walked into the recruiting station I learned that in order to join the Corps, I would need either a high school diploma or a GED with a waiver-unless I also had certain college credits. When I told them that I was 16 and had only completed 8th grade, they quickly dismissed me, not expecting to see me again.

They were wrong.

Not only did I earn my GED, I also did a semester at the local college. A year and a half later the month I turned 18, March 1999, I walked back into the same recruiting station, spoke to the same recruiter, showed him my GED and my college transcripts and felt my first real sense of pride.

Thirteen weeks after arriving at Parris Island, I was changed forever. I graduated as the leader of a platoon squad with a meritorious promotion, and was now well on my way to a shining career as a Marine.

Then came September 11, 2001.
Re-enlisting for my country

Like many after September 11th I wanted to serve, again. I felt I owed something more to my country after my years of training. I trusted my president and my leadership to tell me the truth. I also trusted my own integrity. I knew that I would never willingly do anything that I knew to be immoral or wrong.

I re-enlisted in 2004-this time in the Army National Guard.

At the time I believed that those serving in the ‘global war on terror’ were doing so because they believed in what they were doing-not because they were under compulsion by a contract or retained by stop-loss. After having seen the situation on the ground, I now believe I was wrong. In 2006, I shipped out to Iraq.

In Iraq I was as a JVB Agent-the JVB (Joint Visitors Bureau) served as the protective service for “three star generals and above” and their “civilian equivalents”. This included the Vice President, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, their equivalents in a number of our “allied nations”, and others. I trained for my job as part of this “special unit” prior to deployment, and I spent the majority of my tour in the company of the most powerful people connected to the “global war on terror”.

Even as a JVB agent, my primary job was still infantry. On days when we didn’t have any JVB missions, we would be called on for “search and cordon” operations and other infantry assignments. So, although I worked at the JVB, I was still on the roster of a sniper platoon tasked with various missions “outside the wire”-either as “sniper overwatch” or house raids.

I reasoned that my actions during these missions were justified in the name of “self-defense.” However, I came to realize my perception was wrong. I was in a country that I had no right to be in, violating the lives of people, and doing so without regard to the same standards of dignity and respect that we as Americans hold our own homes and our own lives to.
Destroying lives

I have taken and/or destroyed the lives of people who were defending their families from being the “collateral damage” of the day. Iraqi boys are joining groups like “Al Qaeda” for the same reason street kids in the U.S. join the “Cribs” and the “Bloods”. It’s about self protection, a sense of dignity, and making a stand.

The young man whose father and cousin we “accidentally” killed, and whose mother and siblings cry every time the tank rolls through the neighborhood, doesn’t care who Osama Bin Laden is. The “militants” we attacked were usually no different than an armed neighborhood watch group who didn’t trust their government. We didn’t trust the government either, and we put them in power!

Our own sacrifices, as tragic as they are (and they are tragic), are dwarfed in comparison to the carnage that has been brought on the Iraqi people.

“Success” in Iraq is not a matter of the number of coalition deaths “declining”. Success would be an end of the catastrophe we have inflicted on a entire society, and restoration of dignity and sovereignty.

Iraqis continue to die at a rate 10 to 20 times that of the coalition forces. In Baghdad alone, five years and $950 billion later, the population suffers power and water outages that last for weeks at a time. Meanwhile, we often impose martial law so that no one can leave. The day I saw myself in the hateful eyes of a young Iraqi boy who stared at me was the day I realized I could no longer justify my role in the occupation.

I envy the soldier who is able to see the injustice of this war from afar, and has the courage and conviction to take the stand against it. There will be those who criticize soldiers for being willing to weigh moral convictions against political ambition. What matters is making the stand. Whether you chose not to join the military in the first place, or you realized after joining that it fell short of the requisite levels of integrity, the moment you realize the truth is the moment to take a stand. My moment came with only three weeks of combat missions remaining during my one year in Iraq. Moral conviction has no timing.
Taking a stand

I informed my chain of command of my beliefs. I could tell from that first conversation that things were not going to go well. I told them that I believed our presence in Iraq was unlawful. I explained that I no longer believed in a policy of war and that I would file as a conscientious objector. Simply put, I could no longer in good conscience participate in a combat role against the Iraqi people.

Seconds after the words left my mouth, my life changed. Inside I had more peace than I had felt in over a year. I knew immediately that I had done the right thing. However, I was aggressively disarmed, confined, and shut off from contacting anyone, including family or an attorney.

I was illegally confined to a cot in an operations room, placed under 24 hour guard, and escorted to the bathroom before I was formally charged with refusal to follow an order two weeks later. I remained confined until I pled guilty (with little choice) less than a week after that. I was immediately sent to Camp Arifjan in Kuwait to serve 30 days in a military prison. I was just released from the brig the other day and I’m now in the process of being “kicked out” with an “Other Than Honorable” discharge. I regret nothing.

After I told my command my beliefs, and once they realized they couldn’t intimidate me and that I was serious, they decided that it was going to become an “information war”.

I had many anti-war friends from MySpace and other online networks that got wind that I was being mistreated and it circulated around the world, literally overnight. Before I knew it, I was dragged into the First Sergeant’s office and they began yelling and screaming about how their names were “all over the internet”. They didn’t try to deny what was being said about them-that I was being treated unfairly and that they refused to acknowledge my claim as a conscientious objector-they were simply mad about the exposure.
Military strikes back

The next day I was told that I had been “flagged” as an OPSEC (operational security) “concern”. No reason given. They were hostile and consumed with the task of making “an example” out of me, and they were looking for ways to ruin my reputation and credibility.

They spent days typing up pages of fabricated “counseling statements” to retroactively discredit my military record. The fact that there were no prior record of statements made these accusations obviously fake, and they knew it. They “needed more”.

They demanded repeatedly all of my Internet user names and pass words-MySpace, personal email, everything. All under the threat that “more charges” would be brought against me if I refused.

They wanted to read my emails, all my blogs, everything, in an attempt to find something. Anything they could use to make it look like I had been giving out classified information. They wanted to charge me and ruin my credibility as much as possible, and they desperately needed to be able to justify my illegal confinement.

Two weeks later, when they finally realized that they were not going to be able to charge me with “divulging intel”, they finally charged me with a series of “not following orders”. Not only did these include my refusal to continue combat missions, but ridiculous stuff like “not standing at parade rest” and “being late for work”. You get the picture.

My command eventually offered to “chapter me out” if I would immediately plead guilty to everything and accept a summary court martial. My options were clear. I could play ball, spend 30 days in a brig, and get my life back. Or I could let them put me back on a fully confined restriction for the next two months, while they took every opportunity to make an example of me-to show everyone in the battalion, “this is what happens if you oppose the war.”

I’ll let them think they won, for now.
Freedom

The truth will come out, and there is nothing they can do to hide it. The occupation is a disaster. I’m convinced that every day it continues that it makes America, and the Iraqis less safe.

Objecting to the war and standing up to the military was without question, one of the best decisions I have ever made. I made a stand that was the right one, and I have my freedom back as a bonus. Maybe ten years from now those of us resisting from within the military today will be seen as some of the first few to speak the truth and to follow up with action. Even now I have many to remind me that I’m not alone in my thinking, even a majority of Americans who know that all the pieces of this conflict simply don’t add up.

Seek the truth. Make the stand.

Courage to Resist
Iraq Veterans Against the War

Originally published on Sunday, August 12, 2007 by CommonDreams.org

“Oppenheimer was able to change more than the course of a war. He changed the entire course of human history. Is it wrong to hold on to that kind of hope?” - V for Vendetta

Rove has been guiding the younger Bush’s political trajectory since the candidate’s first shaky press conferences in November 1993, when he announced he was running against the popular incumbent, Democratic Gov. Ann Richards.

A 48-year-old political junkie who has attended nearly half a dozen colleges but never got a degree, Rove now teaches graduate students at the University of Texas. Given his credentials, Rove has plenty to teach. Nine years ago, Texas was dominated by Democrats. Today, it’s ruled by Republicans. Every statewide elected office is held by a Republican and many of those officeholders owe their success to Rove. During the November election, he advised a half-dozen candidates. All of them won.

Rove has a long history in Texas politics. He worked for Bill Clements, the Republican who broke the Democrats’ century-long stranglehold on the governor’s office in 1978. Four years later, Rove began working for Phil Gramm, who was in the U.S. House of Representatives and a Democrat; two years later he helped get Gramm elected to the U.S. Senate as a Republican. During the 1984 election, Rove did direct-mail work for the Reagan-Bush campaign. Two years later, he helped Clements win a second stint in the governor’s office. In 1988, Rove advised Tom Phillips, who became the first Republican ever elected to the Texas Supreme Court (within a decade, the GOP would take all nine seats). Mark McKinnon, a consultant who used to work for Democrats and now directs Bush’s media effort, calls Rove the “Bobby Fischer of politics. He not only sees the board, he sees about 20 moves ahead.”

Bush values Rove’s contributions. In a January interview, Bush called Rove “a close friend of mine” and “confidant” who has “good judgment.” But that good judgment does not come cheap. The first financial disclosure form released by Bush’s presidential exploratory committee shows that the committee paid Rove’s consulting firm $220,228. That’s nearly a quarter of all the money the committee spent from January to the end of March. Rove has since sold his consulting firm to devote all his energy to Bush’s campaign.

But Rove doesn’t mind. Last year, he told a Florida reporter how happy he is to be working for Bush, calling him “the kind of candidate and officeholder political hacks like me wait for a lifetime to be associated with.” Rove may consider himself a hack.

“I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years.”

- President Lyndon Baines Johnson,
(speaking to two governors about his true motivations regarding his support of civil rights legislation, while aboard Air Force One)
In the book titled You Don’t Say, by Fred Gielow, page 33

President Bush signed a bill renewing for 25 years the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act , the historic law which opened polls to millions of black Americans by outlawing racist voting practices in the South.

“The right of ordinary men and women to determine their own political future lies at the heart of the American experiment,” Mr. Bush said. “The Voting Rights Act proposed and signed by then-President Lyndon Johnson in 1965 ‘broke the segregationist lock on the voting box.’”

Originally posted November 11, 2006 @ 12:32

The Department of (misguided) Education



Ancient civilizations all over the world tell us it was the "gods" who created and educated mankind.  They also tell us the gods were both male and female.  The first humans were birthed in the wombs of the female gods.  The creation of Mankind is linked to the modern day global elite (Freemasons) and the biblical Elohim (the gods).    It ties in with the behavior of "God" as well.

Viracocha, Kukulkan, and Quetzalcoatl were all the same individual.  His other names were, Gucumatz in Central America, Votan in Palenque and Zamna in Izamal.    As Viracocha he was teacher to the Incas.  As Kukulkan he taught the Maya everything from Astronomy to Irrigation.  "Quetzalcoatl" was his name to the Aztecs and he taught them as well.   It is a common theme all throughout ancient civilizations.

Your government controlled Education

From birth people are programmed, parents dictate all kinds of rules and regulations to their children.  Your mind is ready for imprinting.  Your first experiences are imprinted and greatly impact the rest of your life.

The Department of Education (DOE) is a faction within the United States government.  It sets the standard for education all throughout the land. People are born into this world and educated in falsehoods schools without even realizing it.  Some grow up and become teachers teaching those lies to future generations.

Most subjects pertinent to your spiritual recovery are not present in the government controlled education system.   The truth about Freemasonry isn’t taught in public schools is it?

The making of a Robot

Where do you start if you want total control of the minds, bodies and souls of a country?  You start with the children. Both schools and churches educate the masses.   As you further your studies you will realize that this isn’t good for the people.   In fact, it turns people into robots.    Robots that do not question what they are taught.

How do you perform this systematic brainwashing of the children?  First you have to start by getting full control of the schools.   You have to be able to force the use of your materials, your methods and your value system.   Teachers must be indoctrinated in college and enrolled into a strong socialist organization to keep them straight.

The teachers are convinced that top educators and the centralized government know what’s best for your children. To handle teachers not indoctrinated, you need to punish those who would rebel, first by controlling their funding and then by passing laws which force them to use your "system".

Next, you make sure that the parents are happy with what you are doing.   HOW? What do you tell the parents? You announce a revolutionary new approach to teaching. You tell the parents that you are going to make dramatic improvements. You use positive, flowery words to put the proper "spin" on what you are doing.

You then tell the parents that this approach will help the children be more tolerant and understanding of others. The chidren will be taught social skills such as conflict resolution, self esteem, etc..

What does that REALLY mean? You teach the children that people have different values and that no set of values is superior, just a different way of looking at things. Christians are no better than Buddhists who are no better than Satanic Cults. It’s all just a "different way of viewing the world".

You know that to control people, you have to get them to stop thinking for themselves but to think for the collective good.

How do you do that? You teach the children in groups. You teach only at the level of the least intelligent. The goal is to "dumb down" the children and get them used to working only for the good of "the group".

School is nothing more than an essential support system for model of social engineering that condemns most people to be subordinate stones in a pyramidal social order.    It prepares a person from the cradle to a job in the adult world.  If you are taught lies as truth you will live the lie thinking it is the truth.

Competition, suppression and intimidation is where the mass education system is rooted.   Such a system cannot support democracy, it cannot support a fair society.

The education system divides and classifies people.  It demands that people compulsively compete with each other and publicly labeling losers by literally degrading them, identifying them as "low-class" material.   "The bottom line for the winners is that they can buy more stuff."

In the 1950’s you saw shows which depicted the family as being fully functional where the man went to work and the woman stayed home and raised and guided their children.  Today you see shows like "Married with Children" (which was on FOX network) where the family is dysfunctional.  You also see forms of soft pornography on Television today where as in the 1950’s you did not.  Television has gone from moral to immoral in just 50 years time.

We are facing a crisis where young people are indifferent to almost everything except the diversion of toys and violence.  Children are unable to concentrate on anything for very long.  They are mistrusting of intimacy, hating solitude.  Children also tend to be cruel, materialistic, dependent, passive, violent, timid in the face of the unexpected and addicted to distraction.  This is to be expected, given the lessons our schools are teaching.

The absurdity… is clear if we ask ourselves what is gained by perceiving education as a way to enhance even further the runaway consumption that threatens the earth, air, and water of our planet. Should we continue to teach people that they can buy happiness in face of tidal wave of evidence that they cannot?

The truth is that schools don’t really teach anything except how to obey orders. Children are conditioned not to think for themselves.   They graduate from high schools as robots.

Television rivals schools, even surpassing them in controlling our children’s lives.   In the past childhood and adolescence were filled with real work, real charity and community pursuits.  With as much time most children spend in school and in front of the television, eleven hours a week is left for them to create a unique consciousness.

Television is by far the most successful mind control tool there is!   Most people go home after work and sit in front of their Televisions and watch all evening.   If you look at the past 50 years of Television what do you think you will see?

Freemasonry controls big government.    freemasonry is clearly the worship of the Devil by the elite top 5%. Luciferic layout for government center Washington D.C. and Masonic writings reflect it.     Carl Claudy, a Masonic author sums it all up is his book, "Cut through the outer shell and find a meaning; cut through that meaning and find another; under it, if you dig deep enough, you may find a third, a fourth — who shall say how many teachings?"

Many peoples beliefs are based on what they were taught.   If someone is living a lie it means their thoughts and lives are not their own.   It also means that they are easily controlled by the ones who educated them.  If this isn’t a cause for alarm, I don’t know what is!

Most of the really religious have been so brainwashed by the teachings of these demons (controllers) so that anything that contradicts what they have been taught is heresy and from the devil, so they will not listen.

Claudy specifically says that Masonry cannot be trusted.   The same can be said about the U.S. Government.   Anybody who trusts their government controlled education is opening themselves up for deception.  The thoughts of the ones who are not aware of the truth are not their own, they are living a lie.  Does The Matrix have you?  People must not be so gullible and believe everything the government tells them or teaches them.  Those who believe in an end times deception have already been deceived because it has been taught that way all through history

The "gods" (biblical Elohim) controlled every aspect of mankind’s development, teaching only what they wanted Mankind to know.  Lies disguised as half truths were and still are the foundation of their education system.

Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.

- Plato

Many Masonic secrets are not even taught in public schools.   The information is out there but who is going to seek it out when they do not realize how important it is to learn or that it even exists?

The symbols of Freemasonry can be tracked all through the history of earth.  The elite Masons (Satanists) have been with us all through history, ever since Eden, controlling and manipulating Mankind for the purpose of slavery and suffering.

The Uneducated Educated

There is a difference between vocational training and true education, and it has been cleverly blurred. Below are some tactics used by smart people to control other people.   These tactics are also seen within the world system that you live.

You must not let people know you are controlling them.  This is the first principle of people control.  If they knew this knowledge they would rebel against you.

Controlling people indirectly is easier than you might think.   Manipulating them into what ever you wanted them to think or do.

Keeping the people ignorant is one basic technique.  People who are educated cannot be manipulated easily.   A direct approach would be to restrict access to education or abolishing it.  That of course would "spill the beans."    Controlling the education they receive is the indirect approach.

It is possible for the educated such as a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer, businessman, journalist, scientist or an accountant to be uneducated. As mentioned above there is a difference between vocational training and true education, and it has been cleverly blurred.  And the reason for this is?  It is so that people can successfully practice their vocations while at the same time remain totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.

The absence of original thought is the most obvious symptom.  To reveal this, ask them a question.  You will hear them recite someone elses thoughts or what they thought the answer was.  This is typical behaviour simply because they grew up learning how to use the library and cite sources.   I gave an example of this above with the "seed" and the convenience store.  This makes things easier for the controller.   With lots of money, university endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control who they will think of as authorities to cite in lieu of doing their own thinking.

Keeping them entertained is another technique.   In ancient Rome, circuses and gladiator contests were not staged because they did not have television.   We have television today because we do not have circuses and gladiator events.  The purpose is to keep the minds of the people focused on sports, political issues and entertainment either way.   They will never figure out the real issues which allow them to be controlled.

An educated person would be most difficult to control as stated above.    Someone who is economically independent is just as difficult to control.   It would be in your best interest to create conditions which will produce "wage earners".   Workers do not have much control over their economic destiny.   Controlling the monetary, credit, and banking systems would be in your best interest to control as well. What this will do is it will allow you to inflate currency and make it more difficult for wage earners to accumulate capital.  Causing the collapse of family businesses, family farms, community banks and entrepreneurs by deflation would be easy for you to do.

Shifting production jobs out of the country and then importing those products is called "free trade".   Trade unions would be kept under control using this method.  You would end up with no unions or docile unions.

Buying both political parties would allow you to control who gets into office.    Making sure your friends or "brethren" (from Freemasonry) get into office to continue with your secret agenda.   Many times people EVEN WONDER why politicians promise to change things for the better but never do?   People do not understand there is a connection there to a secret society that has its own agenda. Freemasonry has an extremely powerful presents in politics.

Eventually the populous will feel completely helpless.  They will think that all the bad things which happen are the fault of nobody in particular.   You can even offer scapegoats if needed.

Then you can ride on their backs.  They do the work while you bleed them dry while not having to worry about one of them sneaking into your home one night and slitting your throat!   If you do it right, they won’t even know whose throat they are cutting.

If you look at symbols of modern government you will see references to the Garden of Eden.  This isn’t limited to just seals of divisions within the United States government either. They are in governments all over the world. Some of these symbols refer to ancient Egypt as well. The DOE seal refers to the tree of knowledge (of good and evil).

From The Forbidden Knowledge

See the movie