Remembering 9/11

Are we afraid to ask the hard questions about what really happened?
The principle known as “Ockham’s razor” states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In layman’s terms, we shouldn’t make any assertions for which we have no proof.
The assertion has been made that the attacks on America on September 11, 2001 were carried out by alleged Arab terrorists affiliated with Al Qaida, under orders from Osama Bin Laden. Somehow that led to a war against Al Qaida in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
While the news media reported that the hunt was on for Osama Bin Laden, the suspect in question was laying in a hospital bed in DuBai under the care of American physicians. Where did the media get their information that Osama was responsible for the attack? Did they get it from the White House whose occupant has strong business ties with the Bin Laden family? And if Osama was in fact the culprit, why did the news report his whereabouts unknown when the United States government knew the exact location of Osama Bin Laden?
Why did prompted the sudden shift off of Bin Laden in Saudi Arabia and onto Al Qaida in Afghanistan? Is it a mere coincidence that Vice President Dick Cheney had a significant stake in Halliburton which in turn had a significant stake in the oil pipeline being laid through Afghanistan? Is it a coincidence that oil prices suddenly made the rich filthy rich while causing the perception of a global oil crisis? Is it a coincidence that Condoleeza Rice had an oil tanker named after her?
Then how did we jump from Al Qiada in Afghanistan to Saddam Hussein in Iraq? How was Saddam responsible for 9/11? Why did the Bush Administration lie about Weapons of Mass Destruction? And when none of the lies were as effective as it was hoped they would be, how did we go from finding those responsible for 9/11 to liberating Iraq from a tyrannical dictator?
The Florida election that allegedly gave George Bush the Presidency was eventually proven to be a fraud. Whether the election was fixed, stolen or bought - it wasn’t legal. Chaos followed.
Today it seems the masses have gone along with the official story about what happened on 9/11. Careful and independent investigators have found all kinds of holes in the official story. Perhaps because the questions raised aren’t from “professional” or “traditionally accepted sources,” the American public is skeptical. The fact remains, however, that there is little if any proof corroborating the official story. The documentary “Loose Change” does an excellent job of highlighting some of these discrepancies.
What does it all mean? Maybe Y2k was nothing more than a social experiment - a preliminary run at guaging social psychology and behavior. Marry that to the “Shock & Awe” doctrine espoused by the Bush Administration and the picture becomes clearer. Become a student of history, sociology, politics, psychology, finance and economics - and you get more of the picture. It means that somebody is paying attention. Is it you?



