Loading....
Recent Article links:

Translate

Category 'Politics'

Bob Johnson criticizes Obama

By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press Writer2 hours, 19 minutes ago

One of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s most prominent black supporters said Sunday he was insulted by the characterization by rival Barack Obama’s presidential campaign of her remarks about the civil rights movement.

Bob Johnson, the nation’s first black billionaire and founder of the BET cable television network, said Obama’s campaign had acted dishonestly and had distorted Clinton’s remarks about Martin Luther King Jr.

Johnson also seemed to hint at Obama’s acknowledged youthful drug use, an issue that led another Clinton campaign official to resign. Johnson later denied that was the case.

Clinton was quoted just before the New Hampshire primary as saying King’s dream of racial equality was realized only when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Some black leaders have criticized that remark as suggesting Johnson deserved more credit than the slain civil rights leader for the passage and enactment of major civil rights legislation.

While introducing Clinton at Columbia College on Sunday, Johnson criticized Obama’s camp.

“That kind of campaign behavior would not be reasonable with me for a guy who says ‘I want to be a reasonable, likable, Sidney Poitier,’” said Johnson, owner of the NBA’s Charlotte Bobcats. He commented after Clinton said in a televised interview Sunday that she hoped the campaign would not be about race.

Johnson also said Obama’s own record should give voters pause.

“To me, as an African American, I am frankly insulted the Obama campaign would imply that we are so stupid that we would think Hillary and Bill Clinton, who have been deeply and emotionally involved in black issues — when Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood; I won’t say what he was doing, but he said it in his book — when they have been involved,” Johnson said.

Obama wrote about his teenage drug use — marijuana, alcohol and sometimes cocaine — in his memoir, “Dreams from My Father.”

Johnson later said his comments referred to Obama’s work as a community organizer in Chicago “and nothing else. Any other suggestion is simply irresponsible and incorrect,” he said in a statement released by Clinton’s campaign.

Obama, campaigning in Las Vegas, declined to respond.

“I’m not going to spend all my time running down the other candidates, which seems to be what Senator Clinton has been obsessed with for the last month,” Obama said.

His strategist, however, didn’t spare Johnson or Clinton.

“I don’t see why this is so much different from what Billy Shaheen did in New Hampshire. Senator Clinton apologized for that. It’s bewildering why, since she was standing there, she had nothing to say about this,” David Axelrod said.

Last month, top Hillary Clinton adviser Bill Shaheen resigned from the campaign after suggesting Democrats should be wary of nominating Obama because his past drug use could be used against him in the campaign.

Obama supporter “I.S.” Leevy Johnson, a former South Carolina state legislator, said it was “offensive” that Clinton stood by during Johnson’s “personal, divisive attack on Barack Obama.”

“For someone who decries the politics of personal destruction, she should’ve immediately denounced these attacks on the spot,” Johnson said in a statement issued by Obama’s campaign.

Clinton was not yet on stage when Bob Johnson made his statements.

___

Associated Press writer Nedra Pickler in Las Vegas contributed to this report.

Corporate elite fear candidate Edwards

By Kevin Drawbaugh - Analysis

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ask corporate lobbyists which presidential contender is most feared by their clients and the answer is almost always the same — Democrat John Edwards.

The former North Carolina senator’s chosen profession alone raises the hackles of business people. Before entering politics, he made a fortune as a trial lawyer.

In litigious America, trial lawyers bring lawsuits against companies on behalf of aggrieved individuals and sometimes win multimillion-dollar settlements. Edwards won several.

But beyond his profession, Edwards’ tone and language on the campaign trail have increased business antipathy toward him. His stump speeches are peppered with attacks on “corporate greed” and warnings of “the destruction of the middle class.”

He accuses lobbyists of “corrupting the government” and says Americans lack universal health care because of “drug companies, insurance companies and their lobbyists.”

Despite not winning the two state nominating contests completed so far, with 48 to go, Edwards insists he is in the race to stay. An Edwards campaign spokesman said on Thursday that inside-the-Beltway operatives who fight to defend the powerful and the privileged should be afraid.

“The lobbyists and special interests who abuse the system in Washington have good reason to fear John Edwards.

“Once he is president, the interests of middle class families will never again take a back seat to corporate greed in Washington,” said campaign spokesman Eric Schultz.

Open attacks on the business elite are seldom heard from mainstream White House candidates in America, despite skyrocketing CEO pay, rising income inequality, and a torrent of scandals in corporate boardrooms and on Wall Street.

But this year Edwards is not alone. Republican candidate Mike Huckabee, former governor of Arkansas, sometimes also rails against corporate power and influence, tapping a populist current that lies just below the surface of U.S. politics.

One business lobbyist, who asked not to be named, said Edwards “has gone to this angry populist, anti-business rhetoric that borders on class warfare … He focuses dislike of special interests, which is out there, on business.”

Another lobbyist said an Edwards presidency would be “a disaster” for his well-heeled industrialist clients.

After this week’s New Hampshire primaries, where he placed a distant third behind New York Sen. Hillary Clinton and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, Edwards might not seem so scary. He ran second in the Iowa Democratic caucuses last week, trailing Obama and just ahead of Clinton.

Edwards suffered a blow on Thursday when Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry snubbed him and endorsed Obama. Edwards was Kerry’s vice-presidential running mate in Kerry’s failed Democratic bid for the White House in 2004.

BUSINESS’S FAVORITE UNCLEAR

Asked which candidate their clients most support, corporate lobbyists were unsure. Clinton has cautious backing within the corporate jet set, as do Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain and former Republican Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, they said.

These candidates represent stability to executives who have much to lose if November’s election brings about the sweeping change some candidates are promising.

Obama and Huckabee register largely as unknown quantities among business owners, both large and small, say lobbyists.

“My sense is that Obama would govern as a reasonably pragmatic Democrat … I think Hillary is approachable. She knows where a lot of her funding has come from, to be blunt,” said Greg Valliere, chief political strategist at Stanford Group Co., a market and policy analysis group.

But Edwards, Valliere said, is seen as “an anti-business populist” and “a trade protectionist who is quite unabashed about raising taxes.”

“I think his regulatory policies, as well as his tax policies, would be viewed as a threat to business,” he said.

“The next scariest for business would be Huckabee because of his rhetoric and because he’s an unknown.”

(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh; editing by John Wallace)

Democrats See Obama as Best Chance to Beat G.O.P., Exit Polls Find

By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and MEGAN THEE

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Democratic primary voters in New Hampshire viewed Senator Barack Obama as more likely than Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to beat the Republican nominee in 2008, according to exit polls conducted Tuesday, a reversal of the previous trends in national polls.

But in contrast to polling results in the Iowa caucuses, women here rallied around Mrs. Clinton. Nearly half the women who voted in the Democratic primary gave her their support, the exit polls showed.

On the Republican side, nearly half of primary voters said their biggest concerns were terrorism and the Iraq war. The exit polls showed that nearly half were dissatisfied or angry with President Bush. A third disapproved of the war. Each of those groups of Republicans broke decisively for Senator John McCain, suggesting more viewed him as a critic than as a supporter of the administration.

The wide-open contests in both parties drew record crowds, and some polling places were forced to send out for extra ballots. Voters in both parties said that they were worried the economy was going in the wrong direction — including nearly all Democrats and about 8 in 10 Republicans — but the exit polls suggested that a more complicated mix of issues decided the races.

Voters said they resoundingly rejected the populist appeals to their economic anxieties that they had heard from John Edwards among the Democrats and Mike Huckabee among the Republicans. Instead, Democrats said they were drawn to Mr. Obama’s promises of unity and change, and Republicans to Mr. McCain’s leadership in matters of national security.

Undeclared voters, who can participate in either primary, were a major factor on the Democratic side. Mr. Obama won big among undeclared voters but lost to Mrs. Clinton among registered Democrats. On the Republican side, Mr. McCain beat former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts among undeclared voters, who have been a mainstay of his support, and registered Republicans.

The exit polls were conducted by Edison/Mitofsky for the National Election Pool consortium among 1,799 Democratic voters and 1,300 Republican voters. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus four percentage points for each party.

Mr. Obama received more than twice as much support as Mrs. Clinton among voters under 30, lost to her only narrowly among older voters and beat her handily among men.

Voters in the Democratic primary were roughly evenly divided among those who considered the war, health care and the economy the most important issues.

Mr. Obama campaigned as an early opponent of the war in Iraq, and Mrs. Clinton campaigned as best-qualified to overhaul health care. But the exit polls indicated that both voters most concerned about the war and those most concerned about the health care system favored Mr. Obama, while voters who cited the economy as their top concern went for Mrs. Clinton.

Voters in the Republican primary were roughly evenly divided among those who cited the economy, the Iraq war, terrorism and illegal immigration as their top concerns. In addition to dominating the votes of those concerned about terrorism and the war, Mr. McCain won among those most concerned about the economy — an area where Mr. Romney, a founder of a giant private equity firm, hoped to have an edge.

Mr. Romney, who hammered Mr. McCain with advertisements criticizing his support for allowing illegal immigrants a path to citizenship, attracted the most support from voters concerned about that issue.

But criticism of Mr. Romney for changing his position on abortion rights and his tone on other social issues clearly hurt him. About half the Republican voters who sought a candidate who “says what he believes” chose Mr. McCain. About one in 10 chose Mr. Romney.

The Next Administration?

You’ve heard of fantasy football, right? Why not a game of fantasy government? Any takers?

Barack Obama - President
Ron Paul - Vice President
John Edwards - Attorney General
Hilliary Clinton - Secretary of State
Rudy Giuliani - Secretary of Homeland Security
John McCain - Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Bill Richardson - Secretary of Interior

Issues:

Immigration

Why it is an issue:

  • Taxes resources
  • Growth of population that does not honor or respect fundamental values of citizenship
  • Undocumented persons

What not to do:

  • Erect wall with armed robotic sentries posted at intervals along border.
  • Place minefield along border.
  • Continue current border patrol program.

Proposition: Implement humane programs to deter illegal immigration including but not limited to:

  • Create DNA database of all captured illegals.
  • Retrain border patrol agents as detectives.
  • Fine and/or confiscate businesses and property of employers hiring illegals and families taking them in without reporting them.
  • Zero-tolerance enforcement.
  • Property is sold to finance salaries and deportation expenses.
  • Possible incarceration at work camps.
  • Education initiatives on both sides of the border regarding immigration.

Economy

Why it is an issue:

  • Gas prices
  • Home foreclosures
  • Lagging wages
  • Stock market jitters
  • Rising education costs

What not to do:

  • Continue our dependency on foreign oil.
  • Continue our relationship with the Internal Revenue Service.
  • Continue operating within the current economic model.
  • Continue to import goods and services to meet our national needs.

Proposition:

  • Divert defense budget to research and development of alternate sources of energy.
  • Overhaul the American Banking System to reclaim independence from world banking industry.
  • Cancel our contract with the Internal Revenue Service.
  • Invest in the development of environmentally responsible and efficient energy sources.
  • Divest ourselves of dependence on foreign markets.
  • Strengthen our commitment to academic and vocational leadership.

Health Care

Why it is an issue:

  • Because everybody in America is sick (smile).

What not to do:

  • What we’ve been doing.

Proposition:

  • Follow the French.

Terrorism

Why it is an issue:

  • Because people still don’t believe that the Bush Administration was behind 9/11.
  • Because people don’t understand how the C.I.A. operates.

What not to do:

  • Believe everything the media reports without holding it up to a candle.
  • Believe we are above the law.
  • Force feed our views down the rest of the world’s throats.

Proposition:

  • Weed corruption out of our government and keep it out.
  • Adopt extreme zero tolerance policies for corruption.
  • Re-establish diplomatic relationships world-wide.
  • Humble ourselves as a nation and right our wrongs.
  • Understand our standing in the world and recommit ourselves to excellent values.

The Presidential Candidates 2008

Democrats

Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Posts Topic Page Video

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Posts Topic Page Video

Christopher J. Dodd

Christopher J. Dodd
Posts Topic Page Video

John Edwards

John Edwards
Posts Topic Page Video

Mike Gravel

Mike Gravel
Posts Topic Page

Dennis J. Kucinich

Dennis J. Kucinich
Posts Topic Page

Barack Obama

Barack Obama
Posts Topic Page Video

Bill Richardson

Bill Richardson
Posts Topic Page Video

Republicans

Rudolph W. Giuliani

Rudolph W. Giuliani
Posts Topic Page Video

Mike Huckabee

Mike Huckabee
Posts Topic Page Video

Duncan Hunter

Duncan Hunter
Posts Topic Page

John McCain

John McCain
Posts Topic Page Video

Ron Paul

Ron Paul
Posts Topic Page

Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney
Posts Topic Page Video

Fred Thompson

Fred Thompson
Posts Topic Page Video

Chris Rock’s 2008 Election Analysis

Here’s some comic relief. (smile)

Democratic Presidential Candidates with Tavis Smiley

Don’t ask me to remember everything everybody said. My head was filled with my own ideas as the candidates were speaking. Quiet as its kept, I wondered if any of the persons standing on stage were worthy material. Now of course there are some that I favor, some that I really like… but in the overall picture - I had my doubts.

From the beginning the candidates appeared preoccupied with appearances and ingratiating handshakes than taking care of business. Tavis had to physically break up their photo-op and shoo them to their podiums to begin the forum.

On the rostrum were Senator Hilliary Rodham Clinton (NY), Senator Joe Biden (DE), Governor Bill Richardson (NM), Former Senator John Edward (NC), Senator Barack Obama (IL), Congressman Dennis Kucinich (OH), Former Senator Mike Gravel (AK), and Seator Christopher Dodd (CT).

Unfortunately the questions I expected, weren’t asked or answered. I don’t know why the change in format occurred, but I wish it hadn’t. In answering the questions that were asked, as to be expected, there was a lot of politicking (along with the sometimes outlandish responses of Mike Gravel).

Everybody had something to contribute to the conversation, each leaving distinct impressions based on their responses.

Senator Clinton

Politically savvy and an educated debater, I didn’t question whether or not she’d be able to handle the White House, but rather, if it was time for her to assume the presidency. While her leadership isn’t questionable, what kind of leader she would be is. Because of who she is, Clinton might be a little out of touch, a buffer of baggage around her disrupting her connection with the people. Her ambition and confidence are apparent, but her authenticity is suspect because of her sophistication.

Senator Biden

This man put his foot n his mouth early. I got the impression he had just read Bill Cosby’s tirade against the younger generation and their lack of parenting skills. He came across as a “You people” type of person, not connected at all, seeing the black community as separate, not included in America.

Governor Richardson

Seemed like a fish out of water on stage with the likes of Clinton, Obama, Edwards and Dodd. Not the greatest orator, but he did come across as sincere and imbued with a wise spirit (when he wasn’t trying to wing it). I liked him, though. Patient, he didn’t seem to feel a need to prove himself. He struck me as the type who, upon assuming office, would make sure that what needs to get done will get done as long as he has the right people. He didn’t over promote the issues and he seemed genuinely connected. Some of his spontaneous answers were off the mark. I caught him blowing smoke a little bit, even making some over generalizations, but that’s okay. He seems less like a talker and more like a doer.

Former Senator Edwards

I think he has the best shot at the Republican machine, most accepted, most mainstream, comes off as a progressive white guy, but he also comes off as somebody who would renege on his promises, better at photo ops and speeches, a good figurehead.

Senator Obama

Young. The wisdom of life experience is lacking a bit. He has the passion and the training, a fresh and unique presentation - all of which are necessary. But with what’s going on in the country, the polarization – he’d have to really work to get everybody to buy in. I think there would always be issues of fear and trust by conservatives.

Congressman Kucinich

I liked him. He would point out flaws really easy. Call things as they are. A great auditor. A little quiet for a presidential figure.

Former Senator Gravel

This guy was nuts! His campaign cape had to do with abolishing the War on Drugs. That was pretty much his answer for everything. On more than one occasion he castigated his fellow politicians, saying that everything that was wrong with politics was their responsibility, that nothing would change, and calling his peers everything but charlatans, impotents, and morally inadequate imposters.

Senator Dodd

Very Presidential. Good answers. Old school. Very politically articulate. Didn’t trust him. He came off as “you can trust me” kind of guy, but if you have to say it…


…on AIDS

Nobody answered the question outright, just gave stats, alluded to finding a cure, and finally got around to education being the best prevention. Obama took it a step further by suggesting the analogy between AIDS and poverty. Without economic development opportunities, the community’s immune system is compromised and it is left vulnerable to a plethora of maladies. I think Kucinich mentioned something inspired from watching Michael Moore’s latest movie. Gravel actually said something like, “you need to be more proactive and step up and put pressure on the insurance companies because AIDS is ravishinig (his word) YOUR community!” How’s that for inclusion? Dodd mentioned that the role of government is to fund and support those programs which help its citizens and that it was important to provide access to medical coverage.

…on Darfur

Dodd said we should take unilateral action and get our military out of Iraq. Clinton said it should be a three step approach. First that we should move in the peacekeeping force that has already been agreed upon, second that the U.S. or preferably the U.N. should provide logistical support, and third that “We need to create a no fly zone over Sudan, and if they violate it, we need to shoot them down! That’s the only thing that will get their attention.” Obama challenged that, past dealing with Darfur, we should explore and develop trade opportunities and investment with Africa. He suggested that our foreign policy with Africa is what is missing (for some reason I thought he was alluding to the late Ron Brown) and that the United States’ long term security depended on these things. Kucinich won applause from the audience by saying that we should stop looking at Africa as a place to be exploited - that if their was oil in Darfur, we’d be occupying that land at this very moment. And Gravel, whew! He flat out said that nobody on the roster had the moral judgment to effect any kind of change or they would have done it already!

Karl Rove: The Architect Of Evil

“Oppenheimer was able to change more than the course of a war. He changed the entire course of human history. Is it wrong to hold on to that kind of hope?” - V for Vendetta

Rove has been guiding the younger Bush’s political trajectory since the candidate’s first shaky press conferences in November 1993, when he announced he was running against the popular incumbent, Democratic Gov. Ann Richards.

A 48-year-old political junkie who has attended nearly half a dozen colleges but never got a degree, Rove now teaches graduate students at the University of Texas. Given his credentials, Rove has plenty to teach. Nine years ago, Texas was dominated by Democrats. Today, it’s ruled by Republicans. Every statewide elected office is held by a Republican and many of those officeholders owe their success to Rove. During the November election, he advised a half-dozen candidates. All of them won.

Rove has a long history in Texas politics. He worked for Bill Clements, the Republican who broke the Democrats’ century-long stranglehold on the governor’s office in 1978. Four years later, Rove began working for Phil Gramm, who was in the U.S. House of Representatives and a Democrat; two years later he helped get Gramm elected to the U.S. Senate as a Republican. During the 1984 election, Rove did direct-mail work for the Reagan-Bush campaign. Two years later, he helped Clements win a second stint in the governor’s office. In 1988, Rove advised Tom Phillips, who became the first Republican ever elected to the Texas Supreme Court (within a decade, the GOP would take all nine seats). Mark McKinnon, a consultant who used to work for Democrats and now directs Bush’s media effort, calls Rove the “Bobby Fischer of politics. He not only sees the board, he sees about 20 moves ahead.”

Bush values Rove’s contributions. In a January interview, Bush called Rove “a close friend of mine” and “confidant” who has “good judgment.” But that good judgment does not come cheap. The first financial disclosure form released by Bush’s presidential exploratory committee shows that the committee paid Rove’s consulting firm $220,228. That’s nearly a quarter of all the money the committee spent from January to the end of March. Rove has since sold his consulting firm to devote all his energy to Bush’s campaign.

But Rove doesn’t mind. Last year, he told a Florida reporter how happy he is to be working for Bush, calling him “the kind of candidate and officeholder political hacks like me wait for a lifetime to be associated with.” Rove may consider himself a hack.

Barack Obama, Part 3

Barack Obama, Part 2

Fit to be a martyr?

Listening to the speeches, one immediately hears something different. That difference inspires hope. That hope is that things can be better than they are and that change is on the horizon. That hope also awakens a certain vigor. The listener feels compelled toward action, to take part in a transformation which begins with the act of standing up and taking responsibility for the change that must come now.

I had been guilty of riding the fence when it came to forming an opinion about the senator who would be president. I had heard the hoopla and caught snippets of the conversations about him, but I had yet to investigate for myself what this man was about and what, if anything, his political career meant to me.

Generally distrusting of politicians, I have seen that Capitol Hill has a way of transforming men into unholy creatures initiated into a seedy game that has its own language, culture and religion. One might argue that these derelicts of humanity have brought the underbelly of society with them into seats reserved for men of integrity and honor. Others might argue that the uncommon man is overwhelmed by the political morass which has become our government, impotent to tackle the herculean tasks set before him.

The muck and mire of Congress has a way of catching good intentions and drawing them to the bottom of a stagnant bog where doing the right thing is debated until there is neither the will nor interest to actually do anything. This is one of the lenses through which I observe a man like Obama.

Those politicians who are successful at capturing the media’s attention garner more of my criticism naturally. I don’t know if that speaks more to my perception of the politicians or the media. In an age where governors can steal presidencies, share complicity in an act of terror against their own country, profit off of it, go to war under false pretenses, hold the constitution hostage under a so-called Patriot act, stack the Supreme court and the lower courts with party-lined cronies, reap profits from oil and pharmaceuticals while passing exploitation legislation and enacting policies to guarantee those profits, and politicizing the media so that it spouts party-line propaganda designed to keep the masses confused, distracted and misinformed - I think I am justifiably suspicious. That’s another story, though.

Barack and Blacks

Like Martin, Malcolm and others, Barack poses a potential threat not only against the establishment, but its collaborators who have managed to remain hidden from the public eye. In heralding a new day, Barack threatens the Jackson’s and Sharpton’s who insist that it is their job to keep the peace - when in fact they have done little or nothing for the Black community at large. They are, no doubt, members of the infamous Boule, a membership of the black elite, literally defined as Advisors to the King. Barack threatens to expose these co-conspirators who operate within the legacy of W.E.B. DuBoise as he did everything in his power to undermine the efforts of Marcus Garvey. Exposed, the classism within the Black community would be on public display, an easy mark for journalists and politicians, threatening to uproot a different establishment - the subversion of Black potential. No more handouts but now calling people to earn their way. Beware those who shout Hossana! Hossana! Once they find out what Barack is up to, they will surely cry out for his crucifixion.

Already the community is divided. Some trust him and some don’t. Everybody has their “legitimate” reasons for feeling the way they do. The fact of the matter is that barack’s success will depend on who he surrounds himself with. What worries me is that, especially in todays age, their is always a weakest link.

Always a Judas in the bunch

I can’t help but think about the assassination of Malcolm X and the evidence that has yet to be fully investigated to conclusion, bringing to like the entire context of his demise, when I think of Obama. Why?

There is always someone in the group willing to sell out for a few pieces of silver, whose motivations are self centered and limited in scope rather than community focused and taking the long view. The dangerous one’s, the Judases - always seem to find their way inside (or perhaps the powers and principalities are ust that effective at turning otherwise well intentioned souls into betrayers of themselves and their community). Whatever the case, it is a real concern that, should Obama successfully attain the position he aims for, he is a young mark, without the coat of armor necessary to shield him from the arrows of his enemies.

Begs the question as to whether Obama is a man of God. To some, this is a serious question with serious implications, not only for the man but for the future of the community at large as well.

If I may digress a bit. In a society which still defines by race and among communities still defining themselves by race, what then is the man or woman who sees him or herself as a human being first. In other words, when the time for change presents itself, who is ready to embrace the next step in our social, spiritual and economin evolution. The old guard will undoubtedly make its bid to convince the masses that tehy are still needed - that tried and true ways must endure rather than evolve. I think they are only afraid of losing the false sense of status and power that they see themselves as having accumulated and earned at the expense of those who have invested their trust and power in, in order to make a change for the better. But what better has come?

Barack on Iraq

It is unfortunate that the same rationale that condemned anybody questioning what happened regarding 9/11, also taints the freedom of speech and freedom of investigation of anyone speaking out against the war in Iraq. A war which was declared over years ago continues to cost lives. One side will argue that in order to win this thing we need to stay the course. I thought wars were only declared over once there was victory or defeat. What is raging now in Iraq has come to be named as a sectarian civil war among Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites. If this is the case then the American presence within this environment is questionable. One has to question what the unstated agenda is. What is worth the lives of those who should not be invested in the skirmishes within the region? Who are we supporting and why? Who are we against and why? Simple answers belie more serious consequences. We need to ask those questions, but more importantly, we need the real answers. Wasted lives, as Barack was condemned for saying, had nothing to do with denigrating American soldiers but rather criticizing the reasons behind putting their lives at risk. Are these soldiers fighting for American interests, private interests, or global interests. If it is about the stabilization of the region, isn’t that an international concern fit for a UN force, rather than an American involvement?

Holding this man up in prayer, realizing the hurdles he must overcome, bespeaks the hope that many invest in a man of capability. But what are his true motivations and intentions? These are the questions that should serve to unite rather than divide. Yet as varied as the trivial concerns are of the masses, so too are the prejudices against any symbol of change. Everyone wants the best man on THEIR side. But what if THEIR side isn’t the RIGHT side. Is the question a matter of self interest, or truth? How many would be willing to sacrifice their position after having invested so much time and effort in building, maintaining and promoting it if they suddenly find themselves on the wrong side of right? How many would damn the truth and pursue their own ways regardless?

Who shall lead them, for they will not lead themselves or let themselves be led. In the old testament the people of Israel asked for a king when they had God Almighty. They begged and pleaded, bitched and moaned for a king because “everybody else had one.” In trying to keep up with the Joneses, they betrayed their protector, their provider and their sustainer. They chose imperfection over perfection.

Shall Obama be the next Messiah, or one of many who choose to stand in their own integrity, free of the sanctions of the world they live in and challenging the minds of his contemporaries with a vision of integrity, honor and truth.

Operation COINTELPRO by Hoover was supposed to cut off such roots before they could sprout. The now defunct program has certainly evolved into more diabolical if less obvious policies. Perhaps figuring that a few leaders with an impotent following would be less troublesome than a few leaders with an inspired following is a better scenario, the black community at large has seemingly become more illiterate, less conscious, and drugged with a plethora of vices and addictions.

Who will lead THIS people to the promised land. A better question would be - who wants to go to the so-called promised land. Too many have already sold out for the crumbs that they have - a bunch of cheap jewelry set in cheap dreams. What can you give such a people? Nothing at all.

I’ve heard people debate whether or not it is realistic that a freshman senator with little or no experience on Capitol Hill can have a real shot at the presidency. To forecast success based on opinions of practicality seems a task best left to professional debaters. What matters more is the vision and leadership the candidate brings to the fore. Too often in history have great teams been thwarted by reluctant egos and recalcitrant powers. A maverick comes along who doesn’t buy into the defeatus attitudes of what can’t be done and sees only his vision of what is possible. His enthusiasm, commitment and charisma win over the team and together they achieve victory which was within their reach all along, but denied for the pessimism and traditions of an establishment rotting in old ideas.

I have heard some say that the Democrats are simply the reverse side of the same coin and that nothing will really change as far as politics goes, and that this time around it is up to the Democrats to bring the disenchanted back into the fold, to reignite hope and belief in the political system as it exists. They are preying on people’s frustration, but are simply playing the game of good cop, bad cop to achieve the same ends.

Do the candidates seek power or a better world, influence or justice, political clout or the best interests of humanity. We need a coach to guide us through the ills of society, show us the light at the end of the tunnel, and make us believe it is within our reach. Is Obama this person? Even if he falls short of being a messiah, he still stands head and shoulders above practically every other candidate in the running. He is, no matter how anyone’s agenda influences opinion, a beacon everyone looks up to and not down at.

Announcement of Candidacy

 

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Photo Gallery

Printer's Row 2007

Children

Wonderful human beings

Add to My AOL

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Add to netvibes

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



"The Truth shall set you free... ask any martyr."


PPP Direct

ACF loading animated gif